🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Expensive

Based on a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. Similar to many our government's military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and less expensive approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.