🔗 Share this article

Legal representatives informed the tribunal that police maintained reasonable suspicions that Tommy Robinson's phone contained material related to acts of terrorism when they stopped him in the previous year as he tried to leave the UK.

Refusal to Give Phone Password

The right-wing campaigner, using his legal name is Tommy Robinson, reportedly refused to provide his phone pin to police, claiming it contained “journalistic material.” This occurred after he was intercepted at the Eurotunnel on 28 July 2024.

Trial Claims on Anti-Terror Powers

On the final day of the proceedings, state lawyer the prosecution stated that the anti-terror authorities used by police are intended to permit information collection. She asserted that officers had valid grounds to believe the defendant still have links to right-wing groups, even following the disbandment of the English Defence League (EDL).

“Although his affiliation of the English Defence League has ceased, his views have not disappeared. He is known for having those views and therefore it is a reasonable suspicion to believe that on his telephone there may be information pertaining to terrorist acts,” she informed Westminster magistrates court.

The prosecutor continued, “His beliefs – to which he is allowed – were not the focus for their attention on 28 July. It was his association to individuals who are potentially involved in illegal actions.”

Details of the Stop

The campaigner had arrived alone at the Channel tunnel in a silver Bentley belonging to a acquaintance and was on his way to the Spanish resort of the Spanish coast with over £13,000 in a carry-on, the court heard.

The money was reportedly from a donation drive to offset expenses from organizing a large demonstration that took place the day before in Trafalgar Square.

Legal Team Submissions

Robinson, who disputes failing to comply with counter-terrorism powers during the incident on July 28 last year, faces up to three months in prison or a possible £2,500 penalty if found guilty.

His barrister, defense counsel, said in closing submissions that anti-terror officers who detained his client had engaged in a speculative search” and that he had been illegally held.

Citing testimony from police who stated they called other organizations” after detaining him, Williamson claimed this was a allusion to the security services and that no evidence had been offered from the security service to suggest his defendant was a terrorist.

Williamson said the police intervention was biased” because it was based to a large extent on a personal attribute.” He stated that the “predominant influence” on the choice to stop him was “‘oh look, it’s Tommy Robinson”.

He added that police had used an “extraordinary power that must be properly policed” to try to find out information that was already known. The barrister proposed that Robinson traveled to Benidorm frequently, which should have reduced the officers’ concerns about him.

Expenses and Verdict Date

Robinson claimed that his court expenses in the proceedings were being paid for by the tech billionaire, the owner of social media and electric car companies, who has appeared as an ally of the campaigner and lately addressed a rally arranged by him in the capital via a online broadcast.

A suggested date of next Tuesday for the verdict was changed by the magistrate, the judge, after Williamson explained Robinson was scheduled to be a guest of the Israeli government from Wednesday and would not return until 25 October.

{“I wouldn’t trouble you if this was a trip to Benidorm. I would ask him to rearrange it but he is a guest of a foreign government,” stated the barrister.

Goozee announced he would deliver his verdict on the start of 4 November.