UK Diplomats Advised Against Military Action to Topple Zimbabwe's Leader
Recently released documents reveal that the UK's diplomatic corps cautioned against British military intervention to remove the former Zimbabwean president, Robert Mugabe, in 2004, advising it was not considered a "viable option".
Government Documents Show Considerations on Addressing a "Depressingly Healthy" Leader
Internal documents from Tony Blair's government show officials weighed up options on how best to handle the "depressingly healthy" 80-year-old dictator, who refused to step down as the country descended into violence and economic chaos.
Faced with Mugabe's Zanu-PF party winning a 2005 election, and a year after the UK joined a US-led coalition to oust Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, Downing Street asked the Foreign Office in July 2004 to produce potential courses of action.
Isolation Strategy Deemed Ineffective
Officials agreed that the UK's strategy to isolate Mugabe and building an international agreement for change was failing, having failed to secure support from key African nations, notably the then South African president, the South African leader.
Courses considered in the files included:
- "Attempt to remove Mugabe by military means";
- "Implement tougher UK measures" such as seizing finances and shuttering the UK embassy; or
- "Re-engage", the option advocated by the then outgoing ambassador to Zimbabwe.
"Our experience shows from conflicts abroad that changing a government and/or its bad policies is almost impossible from the outside."
The diplomatic assessment rejected military action as not a "realistic option," and warned that "The only candidate for leading such a military operation is the UK. No other country (even the US) would be prepared to do so".
Cautionary Notes of Significant Losses and Jurisdictional Barriers
It cautioned that military intervention would cause heavy casualties and have "serious consequences" for UK nationals in Zimbabwe.
"Short of a severe human and political disaster – resulting in massive violence, significant exodus of refugees, and regional instability – we assess that no African state would support any attempts to remove Mugabe forcibly."
The paper continues: "We also believe that any other European, Commonwealth or western partner (including the US) would authorise or participate in military intervention. And there would be no jurisdictional basis for doing so, without an approving Security Council Resolution, which we would not get."
Playing the Longer Game Recommended
The Prime Minister's advisor, Laurie Lee, advised Blair that Zimbabwe "will be a real spoiler" to his plan to use the UK's leadership of the G8 to make 2005 "the year of Africa". The adviser stated that as military action had been discounted, "it is likely necessary that we must adopt a long-term strategy" and re-engage with Mugabe.
Blair appeared to agree, writing: "We must devise a way of exposing the falsehoods and misconduct of Mugabe and Zanu-PF up to this election and then subsequently, we could try to re-engage on the basis of a firm agreement."
The then outgoing ambassador, in his valedictory telegram, had recommended cautious renewed contact with Mugabe, though he understood the Prime Minister "might shudder at the thought given all that Mugabe has said and done".
The Zimbabwean leader was finally deposed in a 2017 coup, aged 93. Previous claims that in the early 2000s Blair had tried to pressurise Thabo Mbeki into joining a armed alliance to depose Mugabe were strongly denied by the former UK premier.